Boutique advisory for energy storage and renewable hybridisation.

BESS project sizing defines the optimal power (MW) and duration (MWh) of the storage system based on the grid connection point, the associated renewable generation profile and the target revenues. We work with power and duration matrices, assess clipping capture and POI saturation, and benchmark TIER 1 equipment by round-trip efficiency (RtE), depth of discharge (DoD), degradation (SoH) and cycle life to reach a technically and economically optimal configuration.

A profitability study translates the asset's technical behaviour into financial metrics: IRR, NPV, payback and cash flows, comparing the standalone scenario against the hybrid one. We model the long-term captured price using reference price curves, incorporate CAPEX and OPEX sensitivities, and quantify the potential upside in ancillary services. The aim is rigorous techno-economic modelling that supports the investment decision and the project's bankability.

Renewable project hybridisation combines solar PV or wind generation with storage at the same grid connection point to make better use of the network infrastructure and increase energy delivered. Storage captures surplus that would otherwise be lost to clipping or POI saturation and shifts energy to higher-price hours. We quantify the incremental BESS value on IRR and asset valuation, and define phasing plans and divestment criteria at portfolio level.

Stand-alone storage is a battery connected independently to the grid, earning revenue from price arbitrage and ancillary services. Co-located storage shares a connection point and infrastructure with a renewable plant, reducing connection costs and capturing energy that would otherwise be lost. Each configuration has a different risk, revenue and bankability profile: we analyse both to identify which maximises returns given the site, the available POI and the developer's objectives.

Battery technology selection starts from a neutral, vendor-independent approach. We compare TIER 1 equipment by round-trip efficiency (RtE), depth of discharge (DoD), degradation curve (SoH), cycle life and warranty terms, and match them against the project's technical requirements and business case. The result is a technology recommendation aligned with the project's interest — not a supplier's — optimising performance, risk and cost across the asset's full life.

We support developers, funds and industrial players in strategic energy-storage decisions across the entire value chain: from feasibility and sizing through to EPC support. We bring independent engineering judgement, techno-economic modelling and market insight to decide when, how and with which technology to invest, how to hybridise or phase a portfolio and when to divest. We deliver executive, actionable analysis with full technology neutrality and no conflicts of interest.